PBS has been blogging about crowdfunding – the practice of funding a project or venture by raising many small amounts of money from a large number of people, typically via the Internet – and their latest post engages nonprofits in thinking about the significant opportunity for financial success in crowdfunding.
From PBS’s post:
“The need for alternative fundraising methods clearly varies a lot across organizations. But even comfortable non-profits accept that crowdfunding has the potential to deliver a deep engagement between fundraisers and backers. And, as emergent civic crowdfunding models suggest, it has the potential to produce new alliances”
The post goes on to highlight success stories in the crowdfunding sphere:
” The Long Now Foundation is using this model for its Salon campaign, which has raised just over half of its $495,000 target. “
The post ends with this note of validation for many nonprofit’s marketing savvy and the opportunity to leverage that expertise for crowdfunding success. “Many non-profits are established experts in these areas. Many of them have stronger and more established brands than even the best-known crowdfunding platforms. The quality and scale of crowdfunding campaigns would undoubtedly increase if they decided to apply their expertise to the field.”
While I appreciate what these types of articles do for innovative thinking when they are sent out into the NPO-sphere such as this, with no context to the implementation or integration of such a strategy into a broad range of tactics, it sends most charities desperate for money on a wild – and often disappointing – goose chase for their tens of thousands of dollars from ‘the web.’ At best, this is a distraction and a waste of resources that could go toward raising real money. At worst, it could be the straw that crumbles an already ailing organization.
In reality, what is new is not always relevant. What is relevant is not always new. Basing revenue development on scholarly data and best practices is essential to helping our nonprofits prosper.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?